Logiciel Contact Us
Success Stories Tech News Contact Us
whitepaper

How an Energy Platform Replatformed Onto Multi-Region Cloud.

A migration playbook for VPs of Infrastructure responsible for resilience and regulatory geography - what to keep single-region, what to make active-passive, and what to put on active-active without paying for the whole platform twice.

In depth

Your Single-Region Cloud Cannot Satisfy Resilience Requirements Or Regional Regulatory Geography.

01

Single-region cloud was the default architecture for a generation of energy software platforms.

It is no longer enough. Regulators ask where the data lives. Customers ask what happens when a region fails. The dashboard does not have an answer that holds up under scrutiny.

In shortThe dashboard does not have an answer that holds up…
02

Most replatforming programs we audit start with too broad a scope.

Teams try to move everything to active-active and run out of budget before they finish the workloads that actually need it.

In shortTeams try to move everything to active-active and ru…
The detail

The Three Decisions Every Multi-Region Replatform Hinges On.

Zone · 01

Critical Path Identification

Map every workload. Identify which need active-active multi-region (real-time customer-facing, regulatory-impactful), which need active-passive (operational analytics with longer RTO), and which are fine single-region (internal tooling, exploration).

Zone · 02

Architecture & Data Strategy

Active-active requires multi-region data. The data strategy is the most consequential decision - replication topology, conflict resolution, regional shards for data residency, and the read/write split that survives a region event.

Zone · 03

Migration & Tested Failover

Migration runs incrementally. New workloads launch multi-region by default. Failover is tested on a schedule on real workloads, not theorized in a runbook.

By the numbers

The figures that make it a board-level conversation.

100%
Critical workloads on multi-region active-active coverage
36 of 36
Tier-2 workloads on active-passive
100%
Failover test coverage on workloads that need it
Inside the report

What you'll take away.

01

Weeks 1–3 - Critical path identification

Map every workload. Identify which need active-active multi-region (real-time customer-facing, regulatory-impactful), which need active-passive (operational analytics with longer RTO), and which are fine single-region (internal tooling, exploration).

02

Weeks 4–7 - Architecture and data strategy

Active-active requires multi-region data. The data strategy is the most consequential decision.

03

Weeks 8–10 - Migration and tested failover

Migration runs incrementally. New workloads launch multi-region by default. Failover is tested before it is needed.

04

Weeks 11–40 - Workload-by-workload cutover, residency sharding, and steady-state operations

Move workloads in the order that retires the most risk per week. Implement regional sharding where data residency requires it. Establish the failover-drill cadence the platform will run forever.

Questions

Frequently asked.

How do we handle data residency in regulated jurisdictions?
What about non-AWS clouds?
How much does multi-region cost?
What does "tested failover" actually mean?
Can we run this alongside the existing single-region platform?
Get the whitepaper

Have it emailed to you.

Drop your details and we'll send How an Energy Platform Replatformed Onto Multi-Region Cloud straight to your inbox - no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Download whitepaper
Next step

Critical Workloads Survive Region Events Without Customer Impact.

Talk through how this applies to your roadmap with our engineering leads - a working session, not a sales pitch.

Download White Paper