Logiciel Solutions Contact Us
Success Stories Tech News Investors Contact Us
framework

AI Governance Cost Calculator.

A cost with no counterfactual gets deferred, and correctly. A chief financial officer looking at a $180,000 programme with no stated alternative will defer it, because nothing in the paper says what happens if they do. The opposite error is just as common: count only software licences, produce a number three or four times too low, and have the programme dismantled the first time somebody asks who is actually going to do the work. Roughly three-quarters of the cost at this scale is internal labour, and labour is the constraint that will actually bind.

In depth

Most Cases Price The Programme And Forget The Alternative.

01

What happens by default: the business case has one half.

A careful bottom-up cost is built, presented, and deferred, because the paper never says what the status quo costs. Or the reverse: only cash items get counted, the number comes in far too low, and the programme collapses the first time somebody asks whose quarter this is. Neither version survives contact with a finance team that reads carefully.

In shortNeither version survives contact with a finance team…
02

What a good case does: it presents both halves and both framings.

Gross run cost and net-new run cost, because a reusable evidence pack typically cuts sales-engineering questionnaire time by 40 to 60% and that line is already being paid today. Then the counterfactual: deal friction, incident exposure and remediation under duress, which consistently runs 1.5 to 2.5 times the planned figure because it happens against somebody else's deadline. Defend the deal-friction line hardest, because it is observable in your own CRM rather than borrowed from a survey.

In shortDefend the deal-friction line hardest, because it is…
The detail

Five Pools, And The One Almost Everyone Omits.

Build, run, tooling, certification and inaction. Three of them are routinely mis-sized, and each one is mis-sized in a predictable direction.

Zone · 01

Run cost is partly a transfer

Of 150 person-days a year, customer security review responses and evaluation maintenance are already being paid, usually costing more because they happen ad hoc. Present gross and net-new separately. The gross number is honest about the work; the net number is honest about the decision, and leading with gross alone is the most common reason a good case gets refused.

Zone · 02

Certification priced honestly

Accredited bodies have been quoting roughly $20,000 to $50,000 for initial ISO/IEC 42001 at mid-market scope. Implementation and gap remediation typically adds $40,000 to $150,000, which is why year-one all-in lands between $95,000 and $240,000. A quoted cost of certification naming only the audit fee is misleading by a factor of three.

Zone · 03

The line to defend hardest

Not incident probability, which is the softest number in any model and the first a finance team will attack. Deal friction is different: pull the cycle time of your last ten enterprise deals, isolate the security review stage, and count the ones where an AI question extended it. That evidence is yours and cannot be argued away with a citation.

By the numbers

The figures that make it a board-level conversation.

0.68 FTE
to run an AI governance programme at 200 to 1,000 people
25-40%
the share of year-one ISO 42001 spend that the audit fee actually represents
$95k-$240k
realistic year-one all-in cost of ISO/IEC 42001 for a mid-market deployer
Inside the report

What you'll take away.

01

Step 1 - Get the loaded day rate from finance

Total compensation times a load factor of 1.25 to 1.45, divided by about 220 working days. A $150 error moves year one by roughly $17,000, so do not estimate it.

02

Step 2 - Size the estate honestly

Count AI systems after a real sweep including embedded SaaS and shadow AI, then count high-risk systems separately. High-risk count is the single largest cost driver in the model.

03

Step 3 - Build the counterfactual from your own CRM

Enterprise deals per year, average contract value, days per deal on security questionnaires, and deals delayed or lost on governance grounds in the last twelve months.

04

Step 4 - Present a payback period, not a cost

Put year-one cost against the recoverable share of the status quo, in conservative, central and optimistic cases, and re-run it at twelve months against actuals.

Questions

Frequently asked.

How much does AI governance cost for a company our size?

For a 400-person company with around 18 AI systems: roughly $80,000 of one-time internal build effort, $105,000 a year gross to run of which about a third is already being spent, and $25,000 to $55,000 a year in tooling and external services if you defer a platform purchase. Certification, if elected, is a separate $95,000 to $240,000.

Is ISO 42001 certification worth the money?

Only against demand. Certify when a named deal requires it, or when three or more qualified prospects ask in a single quarter. It attests that you run a management system, not that any AI system is safe, and sophisticated buyers know the difference and will ask for your evidence pack regardless.

Do we need to hire someone to run this?

Usually not, but you do need to stop pretending it is free. Fund half a full-time equivalent of a named senior person and protect it in planning, reducing their delivery commitments by the same amount in writing. A dedicated hire makes sense past roughly forty AI systems, in a regulated sector, or once certification is committed.

What is the cost of doing nothing?

In the worked example, $223,000 to $356,000 annually. The largest component is enterprise deal friction, followed by sales-engineering drag, shadow AI incident exposure, and remediation under duress, which runs 1.5 to 2.5 times the planned figure.

Can we do this more cheaply?

Yes, in three ways. Defer the governance platform through year one. Defer certification until a demand signal exists. And keep the high-risk system count genuinely low by calibrating the rubric properly, since evaluation is the long pole. What does not save money is skipping the register, because an incomplete register understates every downstream figure.

How do we present this to a board that has not asked about AI governance?

Lead with four operating metrics rather than the maturity score, and with the payback period rather than the cost. Registry coverage, high-risk control completeness, intake bypass rate and evidence freshness are four numbers a board can act on.

Get the framework

Have it emailed to you.

Drop your details and we'll send AI Governance Cost Calculator straight to your inbox - no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Download framework
Next step

Bring the numbers, not the number.

Work through your own inputs with our engineering leads before you take it to finance, and we will pressure-test the assumptions that will get challenged. A working session, not a sales pitch. SECTION 7 - FAQ - 5 to 8 questions

Talk to our engineers