Logiciel Solutions · AI Implementation
Put in your numbers. Find out whether automating a process with AI agents pays back, how fast, and what it's worth over three years.
Your numbers
Five inputs. Results update as you move the sliders.
Headcount spending time on the workflow you'd automate.
Salary plus benefits, tools, and overhead.
Roughly how much of the week this work eats.
40% is a realistic starting point. Duvo reports agentic platforms cut manual work by ~40%. ~ Duvo
Reclaimed time is capacity, not cash. This is the share you'd actually book as savings — through reduced hiring or contractor spend. The rest is redeployed.
Design, build, integration, go-live.
Inference plus upkeep. Agents self-heal through UI change — maintenance stays far lower than RPA, where it runs 70–75% of program budget. ~ Codebridge
The verdict
Adjust the sliders — results unlock when you submit.
We’ll email the detailed model and have a senior engineer record a short review of where agents pay off first in your stack. No sales call required.
No spam. We’ll follow up only if it’s relevant.
How the math works. Process cost today = people × loaded cost × time share. Reclaimed time = that cost × automation share. Cashable savings = reclaimed time × the share that converts to real cost savings (the rest is redeployed capacity, not money off the books). Net = cashable savings minus annual run cost. Payback = build cost ÷ monthly net. Three-year net is cumulative and undiscounted: three years of net minus the build cost. It excludes change-management cost and ongoing human oversight of agent output, which you should budget separately. Figures are an estimate to frame a decision, not a quote.
Sources. ~40% reduction in manual work ~ Duvo; RPA maintenance 70–75% of total cost of ownership and ~80% lower maintenance with agentic AI ~ Codebridge / HfS Research. Logiciel Solutions · logiciel.io
