
Enterprise AI security and compliance engineering for LLM apps, RAG, agents, model APIs, data, and integrations. Reduce AI security risk across production systems.
We combine application security, AI engineering, identity, data protection, and adversarial testing to reduce risk across the full AI application stack.
mapping attack paths across prompts, models, retrieval, data, tools, agents, APIs, users, and connected business systems
protecting sensitive information across retrieval, model traffic, logs, traces, embeddings, caches, and generated outputs
restricting credentials, tool access, actions, transaction scope, approvals, and execution boundaries for agentic systems
testing prompt injection, data exfiltration, unsafe tool use, poisoned content, policy bypass, and other realistic abuse paths
applying identity, authorization, secret management, validation, and least-privilege controls around model and business-system connections
capturing architecture decisions, test results, control mappings, exceptions, remediation, and monitoring needed by internal assurance teams
retesting critical controls as models, prompts, retrieval sources, vendors, integrations, and application behavior evolve
AI, application-security, cloud, and software engineers work across architecture, control implementation, testing, remediation, and production hardening.
Security and AI specialists strengthen internal teams on threat modeling, architecture review, adversarial testing, identity, data protection, and secure implementation.
A focused engagement secures or tests one AI application, RAG system, copilot, agent, or high-risk integration against defined security objectives.
We map assets, trust boundaries, data flows, model dependencies, retrieval paths, tools, users, and abuse cases across the AI system.
We test instruction conflicts, untrusted content, unsafe output handling, sensitive-data exposure, and control bypass across AI application workflows.
We review indexing, document permissions, retrieval authorization, source integrity, embeddings, caches, logging, and sensitive-data handling.
We constrain service identities, credentials, tools, actions, approval points, transaction limits, and exception handling for systems that can take actions.
We secure model endpoints, secrets, gateways, rate limits, service authentication, request validation, logging, and connections to business systems.
We exercise realistic attack scenarios, document exploitable behavior, prioritize findings, and work with engineering teams on practical remediation.
We define security signals, incident paths, change triggers, test evidence, control records, and recurring validation to support internal assurance activities.
A framework for mapping threats across input, model, retrieval, memory, data, tool, identity, integration, output, and human interaction layers.
A method for defining which identities, tools, data, actions, limits, approvals, and rollback paths are allowed for each agent workflow.
A framework for deciding which adversarial, access-control, data-leakage, and tool-use tests should rerun when AI components change.
We identify models, prompts, retrieval, data, identities, tools, APIs, users, trust boundaries, and high-impact abuse scenarios.
We rank threats by exploitability and impact, then define data, identity, authorization, tool, monitoring, and testing requirements.
We work with the application architecture to strengthen access, validation, isolation, secrets, data handling, agent permissions, and safe failure behavior.
We test realistic prompt attacks, data exposure, retrieval abuse, authorization gaps, unsafe actions, and integration failures against defined criteria.
We track security signals and rerun critical tests as models, prompts, vendors, data, tools, and application behavior change.



Teams that needed to ship fast, and did. Here's what partnering with Logiciel felt like from the inside.
Enterprise AI security protects AI-enabled applications across models, prompts, retrieval, data, identities, tools, APIs, agents, and user workflows. It extends traditional application and cloud security with controls for AI-specific failure and abuse patterns.
Common risks include prompt injection, sensitive-data exposure, insecure output handling, weak retrieval permissions, excessive agent privileges, insecure integrations, model or dependency risk, and insufficient monitoring.
RAG security includes controlling which documents are indexed, enforcing authorization during retrieval, protecting vector and metadata stores, validating source integrity, limiting sensitive data, and testing for cross-user or cross-tenant leakage.
Agents should use scoped identities, least-privilege tools, explicit action boundaries, validation, transaction limits, approval for consequential actions, auditable execution, and safe handling when tools or context fail.
Prompt injection testing checks whether malicious or untrusted content can override intended instructions, reveal protected information, bypass policies, or manipulate connected tools and workflows.
No. Security controls and evidence can support compliance activities, but compliance depends on the organization, jurisdiction, data, use case, and applicable requirements. Legal and regulatory interpretation should remain with qualified professionals.
Critical tests should be repeated when models, prompts, retrieval sources, permissions, tools, integrations, vendors, or application behavior change. Higher-risk systems may also need recurring adversarial testing and monitoring between releases.
Share the AI application, RAG system, copilot, or agent you need to protect. We’ll help map the attack surface, prioritize controls, and define the testing needed before production.