
Machine learning development services for prediction, forecasting, and anomaly detection. Build, deploy, and monitor ML with Logiciel.
We combine data engineering, model development, software integration, and MLOps to build predictive systems for products, operations, forecasting, classification, recommendations, and decision-support workflows.
defining the prediction target, intended action, success measure, and acceptable error trade-offs before training
building validated datasets and feature pipelines from business records, events, operational data, historical outcomes, and approved external sources with lineage and leakage checks
comparing baselines, classical ML, deep learning, and other methods against quality, explainability, latency, and cost
testing predictive quality, decision value, data quality, serving latency, model stability, and cost using appropriate splits, baselines, backtesting, and representative scenarios
connecting predictions to APIs, batch jobs, product features, operational systems, and appropriate review workflows
versioning datasets, code, artifacts, deployments, monitoring, rollback, and retraining decisions through MLOps practices
monitoring drift, outcome quality, data dependencies, operational failures, and the effect of predictions on real workflows
Data, ML, software, cloud, and QA engineers work across data readiness, experimentation, model development, deployment, and monitoring.
Specialists strengthen your team across feature engineering, modeling, evaluation, integration, MLOps, and production troubleshooting.
A focused engagement builds or improves one predictive model or ML-backed workflow against agreed data, quality, deployment, and operational criteria.
We define the prediction target, business decision, available business records, events, operational data, historical outcomes, and approved external sources, label quality, risks, and success criteria.
We build validated datasets, feature transformations, training windows, lineage, quality checks, and repeatable preprocessing pipelines.
We establish baselines, compare suitable algorithms, tune models, and track experiments against realistic validation methods.
We assess predictive quality, decision value, data quality, serving latency, model stability, and cost, error patterns, data leakage, robustness, and performance across relevant slices.
We connect predictions to application APIs, dashboards, operational systems, and human review so scores can support a defined decision.
We implement model registries, CI/CD, batch or online serving, environment controls, monitoring, rollback, and retraining workflows.
We track data quality, drift, scoring patterns, outcome performance, service reliability, and retraining triggers after launch.
A method for connecting model quality to the operational action, decision threshold, error cost, and measurable business outcome.
A practical checklist for target definitions, time windows, dataset splits, point-in-time features, label quality, and baseline comparisons.
A framework for separating data incidents, feature changes, performance deterioration, serving failures, and justified retraining.
We identify the target, intended workflow, predictive quality, decision value, data quality, serving latency, model stability, and cost, decision thresholds, and cost of errors.
We validate business records, events, operational data, historical outcomes, and approved external sources, engineer features, prevent leakage, and define appropriate train and test splits.
We train suitable approaches, compare baselines, analyze errors, and choose the model that meets the actual requirements.
We build serving or batch pipelines, connect application workflows, establish release checks, and validate performance and rollback.
We track data quality, drift, predictions, real-world outcomes, latency, and operational cost while reviewing retraining needs.



Teams that needed to ship fast, and did. Here's what partnering with Logiciel felt like from the inside.
They cover defining a predictive task, preparing data, developing and evaluating models, integrating predictions into software, deploying the system, and monitoring performance in production.
Machine learning often focuses on prediction, classification, ranking, forecasting, or anomaly detection. Generative AI focuses on creating content or responses. Some applications combine both, but their evaluation and operating requirements differ.
It depends on the task, signal quality, label availability, model complexity, and acceptable error. We assess feasibility and establish baselines before promising a specific performance level.
We choose metrics that reflect the task and error costs, such as precision, recall, calibration, ranking quality, forecast error, or decision impact, and validate them using appropriate data splits.
Yes. Models can be served through APIs, batch jobs, event pipelines, or other application patterns with access controls, validation, monitoring, and rollback.
We monitor data quality, feature availability, prediction distributions, outcome performance, service health, and drift, then use defined criteria to investigate or retrain.
No. Depending on the data and task, regression, tree-based models, ranking, classical classification, or other approaches may be more suitable and easier to operate than deep learning.
Bring us the prediction or decision you want to improve across products, operations, forecasting, classification, recommendations, and decision-support workflows. We will assess the data, model approach, integration, and delivery path.