
Machine learning development services for energy across prediction, forecasting, and operational analytics. Build, deploy, and monitor ML with Logiciel.
We combine operational data engineering, model development, software integration, and MLOps for asset monitoring, maintenance planning, forecasting, and engineering decision support.
defining the prediction target, intended action, measurable outcome, and acceptable error trade-offs before training
building validated datasets and feature pipelines from approved meter and telemetry data, asset registries, maintenance records, inspection history, weather, and operational events with timestamp alignment and sensor-quality checks
comparing transparent baselines, classical machine learning, deep learning, and other methods against quality, explainability, latency, and operating cost
assessing precision and recall for rare events, lead time, false-alert burden, forecast error, robustness across assets, and performance under changing operating regimes; comparing baselines and representative time-aware scenarios to reveal failure patterns before release
connecting predictions to asset-management platforms, maintenance systems, reporting tools, enterprise APIs, and human-owned engineering workflows with safety boundaries
versioning datasets, features, code, experiments, artifacts, deployments, monitoring, rollback, and retraining decisions through MLOps practices
monitoring sensor drift, telemetry gaps, operating-regime shifts, false-alert rates, forecast accuracy, serving latency, and source availability and adjusting the system based on observed outcomes
Data, ML, software, cloud, and QA engineers work across data readiness, experimentation, model development, deployment, monitoring, and integration into your existing systems.
Specialists strengthen your team across feature engineering, modeling, evaluation, application integration, MLOps, and production troubleshooting.
A focused engagement builds or improves one predictive model or ML-backed workflow against agreed data, quality, deployment, and operational criteria.
We define the engineering or planning decision, required lead time, data quality, operational risk, and review responsibilities.
We align meter, sensor, maintenance, inspection, asset, and weather data with validated timestamps, units, identifiers, and missing-data handling.
We compare suitable forecasting, anomaly, and classification approaches with transparent baselines and asset-specific evaluation.
We assess rare-event precision and recall, false-alert burden, lead time, forecast error, uncertainty, and robustness across operating regimes.
We connect outputs to approved enterprise tools and engineering review processes while keeping safety-critical control outside unapproved ML actions.
We implement versioned data and models, batch or online inference, deployment checks, monitoring, rollback, and controlled retraining.
We track sensor health, telemetry completeness, drift, operational changes, model errors, and justified update triggers.
A framework for mapping failure lead time, false positives, missed events, operational response, and engineering review.
A checklist for timestamps, sensor calibration, missing intervals, operating regimes, leakage, and representative asset splits.
A framework for distinguishing model degradation, sensor incidents, asset changes, and safety-critical action boundaries.
We identify the asset or planning decision, required lead time, operational impact, safety boundaries, and measurable acceptance criteria.
We validate sensor, asset, maintenance, weather, and meter data; align time windows; and establish realistic baseline models.
We train suitable approaches, compare baseline performance, analyze errors and uncertainty, and select the model that meets the workflow's actual requirements.
We build serving or batch pipelines, connect authorized application workflows, establish release checks, and validate performance, monitoring, and rollback.
We track data quality, drift, predictions, real-world outcomes, latency, and operational cost while reviewing whether model updates are justified.



Teams that needed to ship fast, and did. Here's what partnering with Logiciel felt like from the inside.
They cover defining a predictive task, preparing data, developing and evaluating models, integrating predictions into software, deploying the system, and monitoring performance in production.
Machine learning often focuses on prediction, classification, ranking, forecasting, or anomaly detection. Generative AI focuses on creating content or responses. Some applications combine both, but their evaluation and operating requirements differ.
It depends on the task, signal quality, label availability, model complexity, and acceptable error. We assess feasibility and establish baselines before promising a specific performance level.
We choose metrics that reflect the task and error costs, such as precision, recall, calibration, ranking quality, forecast error, or decision impact, and validate them using appropriate data splits.
Yes. Models can be served through APIs, batch jobs, event pipelines, or other application patterns with access controls, validation, monitoring, and rollback.
We monitor data quality, feature availability, prediction distributions, outcome performance, service health, and drift, then use defined criteria to investigate or retrain.
We do not assume model predictions should directly control safety-critical equipment. We design ML as bounded decision support unless the specific application has separately established engineering, safety, validation, and authorization requirements.
Bring us the prediction or decision you want to improve across asset reliability, maintenance prioritization, load forecasting, or operational analytics. We will assess the data, model approach, integration, and delivery path.