You get senior engineers doing the actual work, not a senior name over junior delivery. Every engagement has a clear engagement lead who is your single point of accountability. The team is sized to the work, and it scales down when the work is done rather than padding the bill. Throughout, the code, the architecture, and the knowledge stay yours, and we transfer capability so your team is stronger when we step back.
You have a team and a plan and need senior engineers to move faster. We embed individuals into your team, working in your process and tools. You direct the work; we bring the people. Best when you know exactly what to build and need capacity.
A small, dedicated team (engineers plus an engagement lead) that owns a defined scope end to end. We run delivery; you set direction and priorities. Best when you want an outcome owned rather than just extra hands.
A fixed scope with a defined deliverable and timeline. Best for a well-specified, bounded piece of work where everyone agrees up front exactly what "done" looks like.
| Model | How it's priced | Good fit for |
|---|---|---|
| Staff augmentation | Monthly, per embedded engineer | Known plan, need senior capacity |
| Managed pod | Monthly, per dedicated team | Owned outcome, evolving scope |
| Project-based | Fixed price against a defined scope | Bounded, well-specified deliverable |
We know a real engagement has to clear procurement and security, especially in healthcare and other regulated spaces. We bring our security posture and documentation early so we don't stall your timeline, and as an AWS Partner we work in an environment your teams already trust.
Built
Because a single rate would be misleading. A senior platform engineer for three months and a fixed-scope project are different shapes with different costs. We'll give you a real number fast once we know the scope.
Why don't you just publish prices?
Small enough to prove value without a big commitment. That's the point: see the work before you scale it.
How small can a first engagement be?
Yes. Code, architecture, and knowledge are yours, and capability transfer is part of how we work.
Do we own what you build?
Yes, that's the default for staff augmentation and common across all models. We embed into how you already work.
Can you work inside our process and tools?
Tell us what you're trying to build and the constraints you're under. We'll recommend the engagement model that fits and give you a real scope and price.